From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jan 21 19:50:54 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA05795 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 21 Jan 1998 19:50:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zippy.dyn.ml.org (garbanzo@seoul-234.ppp.hooked.net [206.169.228.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA05760 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 1998 19:50:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from garbanzo@hooked.net) Received: from localhost (garbanzo@localhost) by zippy.dyn.ml.org (8.8.8/8.8.7) with SMTP id TAA02958 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 1998 19:52:17 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: zippy.dyn.ml.org: garbanzo owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 21 Jan 1998 19:52:17 -0800 (PST) From: Alex X-Sender: garbanzo@zippy.dyn.ml.org Reply-To: Alex To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: elf and -current In-Reply-To: <199801220007.QAA08778@gonzo.wolfenet.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk In case anyone else is still following this thread, according to ian@cygnus.com, the nm patch was rejected because it breaks POSIX.2 compliance, and doesn't follow the SunOS practice, and there are no plans to integrate it into a newer binutils. Perhaps something's broken on this end then? Hmm. El hombre mas brillante dijo una vez "Cuidado hay NT". (it's a nerd thing) - alex