From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 21 07:10:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0442810656A6; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 07:10:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 221408FC08; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 07:10:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.topspin.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id KAA11891; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 10:10:10 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from localhost.topspin.kiev.ua ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.topspin.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1OmiDS-00062p-Ct; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 10:10:10 +0300 Message-ID: <4C6F7BD1.4030009@icyb.net.ua> Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 10:10:09 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100603) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <4C6F772A.5020703@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <4C6F772A.5020703@icyb.net.ua> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Latest intr problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 07:10:13 -0000 on 21/08/2010 09:50 Andriy Gapon said the following: > on 21/08/2010 03:03 Doug Barton said the following: >> Here are the results of a vmstat -i, the old dtrace script, and Andriy's >> new one. > > I think that for such amount of data it is better to use links (perhaps a > service like pastebin) rather than inlining it. > BTW, it seems that there are no followups/comments on results of the old dtrace > script, so I am not sure if there is any point in continuing to post it. > It is useless personally for me. > > Back to the data. > Could you please report results of > procstat -k 10 > procstat -k 11 > ? Some additional stuff. Could you please remind what the "old dtrace script" is? :-) Output of sysctl dev.cpu (normal and when the problem hits) Another dtrace script: profile:::profile-1001 { @stacks[curthread->td_oncpu, pid, tid, stack()] = count(); } END { trunc(@stacks, 20); printa(@stacks); } -- Andriy Gapon