From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 25 10:18:58 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE0C64EA; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:18:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E0F551; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:18:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nine.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by smtp-int.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22697AC8B; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:18:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by nine.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9E8601285; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:18:51 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Ermal LuXXi Subject: Re: svn commit: r274709 - head/sys/netpfil/pf References: <201411191331.sAJDV9bH092190@svn.freebsd.org> <86tx1nvcy4.fsf@nine.des.no> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:18:51 +0100 In-Reply-To: <86tx1nvcy4.fsf@nine.des.no> ("Dag-Erling =?utf-8?Q?Sm=C3=B8r?= =?utf-8?Q?grav=22's?= message of "Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:36:51 +0100") Message-ID: <86ppcbvb04.fsf@nine.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:18:58 -0000 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav writes: > This is wrong, and causes a panic with some network adapters (vtnet, for > one). It is closely related to 192013 and should not have been > committed without consulting me first. Please revert, or just #if 0 out > the entire block since the old code is even more wrong than your > version. Note: I am aware that the patch in 192013 is incorrect as well, which is why I never committed it, although I should have noted that in the PR. The current IPv4 code is also slightly wrong, but not as much as the IPv6 code. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no