From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 22 21:14:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52AA16A4CE for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 21:14:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.thilelli.net (smtp.thilelli.net [213.41.129.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CECC043D41 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 21:14:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jpeg@thilelli.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.thilelli.net [127.0.0.1]) by bento.thilelli.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5C2F78C72 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 23:14:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from bento.thilelli.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bento.thilelli.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 51466-02 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 23:14:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from webmail.thilelli.net (localhost.thilelli.net [127.0.0.1]) by bento.thilelli.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F6078C71 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 23:14:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 192.168.1.20 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jgabel); by webmail.thilelli.net with HTTP; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 23:14:09 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <61589.192.168.1.20.1095887649.squirrel@192.168.1.20> In-Reply-To: <20040922210641.GD96357@keyslapper.org> References: <20040922120423.98EAC16A4CE@hub.freebsd.org> <20040922210641.GD96357@keyslapper.org> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 23:14:09 +0200 (CEST) From: "Julien Gabel" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at thilelli.net Subject: Re: Official wallpapers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 21:14:13 -0000 >>> The flame detail around the daemon (can't remember his name...) >>> is excellent. >> IIRC, that's "Beastie". ;) > Beastie was one name used, but wasn't he called "Chuck" at one point? Seems not, according to http://www.mckusick.com/beastie/. -- -jpeg.