From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 22 02:55:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8EF316A47A for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 02:55:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mrl0lz@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A6F743D49 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2006 02:55:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mrl0lz@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i11so309094nzi for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 19:55:00 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=XQ3N4v7rG/64WYVxqChL2AvyUq1Nbn7Q2AMI5pP2LZz3g35ON85qVGmpWx7waGmgPmSoThckIzh2m94GGyyCXXUytK+00S3bjkrLN5mzgvYvk8BsE80WOJ/QlbIEkk2/BcLR6esk2ldDgb5RkRH5RubWN34T7/4c57eLp5GZwHU= Received: by 10.36.25.2 with SMTP id 2mr570986nzy; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 19:55:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.37.2.48 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 19:55:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 19:55:00 -0700 From: "Remington L" To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: pkg_add is driving me NUTS! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 02:55:02 -0000 I have two servers, exact same hardware, exact same version of FreeBSD, in this case 4.10. When I run pkg_add blah.tbz on one machine, it takes between 2-8 hours, on the other 8-10 minutes. These machines are quad-Intel 2.8Xeons, with 4GB of memory. Ive done everything from running make world, to md5ing pkg_add, bzip2, and tar, there identical. I noticed on the one thing, on the machine that takes forever, bzip2 is only using 1-3% load, while the other, which does work, takes 100%. I have SMP compiled into the kernel, well actually, there both using the exact same kernconf. Anyone have ideas??