From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 27 20:49:14 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6934E16A418 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:49:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlfbsd@dong.ci0.org) Received: from dong.ci0.org (dong.ci0.org [IPv6:2001:7a8:2066:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F3013C45A for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:49:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlfbsd@dong.ci0.org) Received: from dong.ci0.org (localhost.ci0.org [127.0.0.1]) by dong.ci0.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l8RLVsYf015685; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 23:31:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mlfbsd@dong.ci0.org) Received: (from mlfbsd@localhost) by dong.ci0.org (8.14.1/8.13.8/Submit) id l8RLVsDp015684; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 23:31:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mlfbsd) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 23:31:54 +0200 From: Olivier Houchard To: Marius Nuennerich Message-ID: <20070927213154.GA15654@ci0.org> References: <20070927170339.GA11021@ci0.org> <200709271630.l8RGULjE032252@casselton.net> <20070927224241.69ea49fa@sol.hackerzberg.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070927224241.69ea49fa@sol.hackerzberg.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Comment bug in locore.S? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:49:14 -0000 On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 10:42:41PM +0200, Marius Nuennerich wrote: > On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:30:21 -0500 (CDT) > Mark Tinguely wrote: > > > > > I would have guessed that line 137 comment is wrong. > > > > 137: ldmia r4!, {r1,r2,r3} /* # of sections, PA|attr, VA */ > > > > (2b loop) > > 131: str r3, [r0, r2] > > > > Where r0 is the startup page table, r2 is the VA offset into table and > > r3 is the PA|attr to be put in the table. > > So is my understanding. As is the order of values on line 185. Fair enough, the comment is wrong, I'll fix it. Thanks ! Olivier