From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 18:29:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E185C16A41C for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 18:29:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jon.mercer@achean.com) Received: from ajax.achean.com (ajax.achean.com [212.87.82.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A2543D1F for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 18:29:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jon.mercer@achean.com) Received: from odysseus.office.achean.com (dsl-217-155-191-89.zen.co.uk [217.155.191.89]) by ajax.achean.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j52ISnno036190 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 2 Jun 2005 19:28:50 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jon.mercer@achean.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by odysseus.office.achean.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j52ISkr8000826; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 19:28:46 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jon.mercer@achean.com) From: Jon Mercer To: "Liam J. Foy" In-Reply-To: <20050602180147.GA790@anarion> References: <429EF96E.16172.33600ABA@localhost> <20050602100934.Y20286@Osgiliath.home.lan> <60053.217.33.199.34.1117734722.squirrel@webmail.achean.com> <20050602180147.GA790@anarion> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 19:28:46 +0100 Message-Id: <1117736926.772.3.camel@odysseus.office.achean.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO,MY_DSL autolearn=no version=3.0.3-achean_mailfilter_v1.00 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3-achean_mailfilter_v1.00 (2005-04-27) on ajax.achean.com Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Negative Review of FreeBSD 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 18:29:03 -0000 On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 19:01 +0100, Liam J. Foy wrote: > > The same reviewer did a review of OpenBSD a couple of articles previously: > > > > http://os.newsforge.com/os/05/05/20/1426216.shtml?tid=8 > > > > On the whole his experience looked worse than with FreeBSD, but the tone > > of the OBSD article was more favorable. Anyone else notice this? > > > > Jem Matzan just seems to be anti-FreeBSD. > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Achean Ltd http://www.achean.com > > Jon Mercer jon.mercer@achean.com Director > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-advocacy-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Jem Matzan is known for poor reviews throughout *BSD. > Ah yes, thejemreport.com, not egotistical at all... Hang on, isn't his 5.4 review nothing more than a slight rewording of the 5.3 review??? This could turn out as character assassination as well as OS assassination. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Achean Ltd http://www.achean.com Jon Mercer jon.mercer@achean.com Director -----------------------------------------------------------------------