From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 24 21:28:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1159516A4DF for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 21:28:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markus.hoenicka@mhoenicka.de) Received: from rrzmta2.rz.uni-regensburg.de (rrzmta2.rz.uni-regensburg.de [132.199.1.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 973E643D49 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 21:28:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markus.hoenicka@mhoenicka.de) Received: from rrzmta2.rz.uni-regensburg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 632326956C; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 23:28:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from yeti.mininet (rrzras2-50.rz.uni-regensburg.de [132.199.209.50]) by rrzmta2.rz.uni-regensburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FFD469566; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 23:28:22 +0200 (CEST) X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.1 (via feedmail 8 I); VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.3.1 From: "Markus Hoenicka" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17646.6613.28038.72832@yeti.mininet> Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 23:27:49 +0200 To: Boris Samorodov In-Reply-To: <80657181@bsam.ru> References: <17646.3029.176290.711490@yeti.mininet> <80657181@bsam.ru> Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/102474: linux_base-fc-4_8 appears broken, does not allow to run Linux binaries X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 21:28:17 -0000 Hi, Boris Samorodov writes: > What is the file /usr/lib/libc.so.6? This file shouldn't exist. Remove > it and try once more... > Indeed, /usr/lib/libc.so.6 was a stale symlink to /usr/lib/libc.so.5 which does not exist. Don't ask me where this symlink came from. The timestamp indicates that it may have been from the original 4.x installation on that box, unless I did something really bad and really stupid back then. After removing the symlink, 915resolution works ok. However, the other failure that I've reported still exists: yeti# /compat/linux/usr/bin/ldd /compat/linux/sbin/ldconfig /compat/linux/usr/bin/ldd: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: not found /compat/linux/lib/ld-linux.so.2 does exist, but /lib/ld-linux.so.2 doesn't. Is that command indeed supposed to work? regards, Markus -- Markus Hoenicka markus.hoenicka@cats.de (Spam-protected email: replace the quadrupeds with "mhoenicka") http://www.mhoenicka.de