From owner-freebsd-net Thu Mar 30 3: 0:33 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rdc1.sfba.home.com (ha1.rdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.0.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C7937BA3F for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 03:00:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from boshea@ricochet.net) Received: from beastie.localdomain ([24.19.158.41]) by mail.rdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111) with ESMTP id <20000330110030.PLW13099.mail.rdc1.sfba.home.com@beastie.localdomain>; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 03:00:30 -0800 Received: (from brian@localhost) by beastie.localdomain (8.9.3/8.8.7) id DAA26505; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 03:09:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brian) Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 03:09:42 -0800 From: "Brian O'Shea" To: Joshua Goodall Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Security of NAT "firewall" vs. packet filtering firewall. Message-ID: <20000330030942.J330@beastie.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: Joshua Goodall , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20000329150222.I330@beastie.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: ; from Joshua Goodall on Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 10:58:37AM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 10:58:37AM +0200, Joshua Goodall wrote: > > I did not intend "raw" as a technical term. I meant simply the use of > /sbin/natd with a very bare & basic configuration, as might be implemented > by configuration via /etc/rc.conf Ah, got it. Thanks. > > fyi the other possible NAT systems used on freebsd might be: > > ipfilter > ppp -nat > netgraph ( i think ) > + many other implementations, but the above will provide you with > plenty of reading matter :) Terrific. Looks like I've got my work cut out for me. Thanks for all of your help, it is much appreciated. -brian -- Brian O'Shea boshea@ricochet.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message