From owner-cvs-all  Thu Sep  2 13:31:42 1999
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (ns.mt.sri.com [206.127.79.91])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3A84F1543B; Thu,  2 Sep 1999 13:31:35 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com)
Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100])
	by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA01070;
	Thu, 2 Sep 1999 14:31:34 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com)
Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id OAA28195; Thu, 2 Sep 1999 14:31:33 -0600
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 14:31:33 -0600
Message-Id: <199909022031.OAA28195@mt.sri.com>
From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: obrien@FreeBSD.org
Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/mkdir mkdir.1 mkdir.c
In-Reply-To: <19990902120912.A45585@dragon.nuxi.com>
References: <199908302112.OAA66970@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
	<3072.936051369@localhost>
	<19990902120912.A45585@dragon.nuxi.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid
Reply-To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams)
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> 
> So we have 2 against it, 2 not in favor but acknowledged the arguments as
> valid, 2 don't care, and 5 for.  That makes 4 vs. 5, not to mention 100+
> "I don't care enough to say anything".  This hardly looks like a major
> force to block this -- looks like we'll go with "-v".

I read it differently, and I see more vocifirous 'votes' against it.
I'm against it, since it bloats stuff that doesn't need to be bloated
for 99.9% of the users.

KISS rules...


Nate


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message