From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 20 00:48:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D1316A41F for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 00:48:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from djp@polands.org) Received: from moab.polands.org (CPE-24-208-53-189.new.res.rr.com [24.208.53.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F24043D62 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 00:48:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from djp@polands.org) Received: from jericho.polands.org ([172.16.1.35]) by moab.polands.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j9JNqJqf050201; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:52:19 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from djp@polands.org) Received: from jericho.polands.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jericho.polands.org (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j9JNqJZh047599; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:52:19 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from djp@jericho.polands.org) Received: (from djp@localhost) by jericho.polands.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j9JNqJH0047598; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:52:19 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from djp) Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:52:19 -0500 From: Doug Poland To: Chuck Swiger Message-ID: <20051019235218.GB47568@polands.org> References: <20051019204428.GB46703@polands.org> <7BF2FC41-83C1-4E8C-8201-846783762B7B@mac.com> <4356CF56.2090106@gmail.com> <6.2.3.4.2.20051019161158.05ff9160@cobalt.antimatter.net> <4356DB52.9030800@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4356DB52.9030800@mac.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: kurt.buff@gmail.com, questions@freebsd.org, Glenn Dawson Subject: Re: Installing 2nd CPU on SMP board X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 00:48:36 -0000 On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 07:48:34PM -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Glenn Dawson wrote: > >At 03:57 PM 10/19/2005, Kurt Buff wrote: > [ ... ] > >>>You want to get the same speed, FSB, and family number of Xeon, and > >>>it is preferable to get the same stepping number if possible. > > > >It's better to match the sSpec numbers...those include the stepping, > >and not all processors of the same stepping have the same sSpec. > > Intel's documentation for dual-proc and multiproc compatibility is > based on family ID and stepping #, not on the s-spec #. > > The family ID is akin to a major version number, and the stepping is > akin to a minor version number. You can get the family ID and > stepping from dmesg, you cannot get the sSpec number via that > directly. For example: > > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.00GHz (2992.71-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf43 Stepping = 3 > Features=0xbfebfbff > Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs > > If you hunt down the right Xeon document: > > http://download.intel.com/design/Xeon/specupdt/30240216.pdf > > ...and search for "0xf43", you get: > > S-Spec CoreStepping CPUID CoreFreq FSB L2_cache .... > SL7ZF N0 0F43h 3 800 2 MB 604-pin micro-PGA > > Thanks for the tip. -- Regards, Doug