From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan  1 11:38:13 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C44616A4CF
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Jan 2004 11:38:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 465AD43D1D
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Jan 2004 11:38:10 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com)
Received: from potentialtech.com ([68.68.113.33]) by mta11.adelphia.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP
          id <20040101193809.OFPI6455.mta11.adelphia.net@potentialtech.com>
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 1 Jan 2004 14:38:09 -0500
Message-ID: <3FF47721.3030600@potentialtech.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2004 14:38:09 -0500
From: Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20031005
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: questions@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: netgraph.ko vs. compiled in.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2004 19:38:13 -0000

I'm not sure if this is a bug, or intended behaviour.  If the behaviour is
intended, documentation improvements may be in order.

If I build a kernel with "options netgraph", in order to use mpd, netgraph.ko
is still loaded at boot (with an error) but mpd does not work.

If I build the kernel without netgraph, netgraph.ko loads, along with other
netgraph modules required for PPTP, and mpd works like a charm.

What I haven't tried yet, is compiling a kernel with all the options for all
the netgraph modules I'll need compiled in to see if that works.

This is FreeBSD 4.9.  Does anyone know if this is intended behaviour or a bug?
If it's intended behaviour, is it in the documentation and I just haven't seen
it?

-- 
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com