Date: 05 Oct 2001 01:31:23 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Removing ptrace(2)'s dependency on procfs(5) Message-ID: <xzpk7ybasok.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <xzpofnnatlh.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <20011004230154.4A0D63809@overcee.netplex.com.au> <xzpofnnatlh.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> writes:
> Yep - at some point the functions should be renamed, and the
> prototypes should probably go into <sys/ptrace.h> instead of the bogus
> <sys/debug.h> I added.
I've put up a new patch that places the prototypes in ptrace.h rather
than add a new header:
http://people.freebsd.org/~des/software/ptrace-20011005.diff
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpk7ybasok.fsf>