From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 21 13:28:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E73816A41F for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 13:28:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ns.kfs.ru) Received: from ns.kfs.ru (kfs.kfs.ru [62.183.117.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F5BB43D48 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 13:28:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ns.kfs.ru) Received: from bsam by ns.kfs.ru with local (Exim 4.52 (FreeBSD)) id 1ESww5-000MV2-1Y; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:27:53 +0400 To: "M. Warner Losh" References: <20051020223340.GA60914@xor.obsecurity.org> <43581E5C.4010006@polands.org> <20051020232308.GA77950@xor.obsecurity.org> <20051020.220346.13027284.imp@bsdimp.com> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:27:53 +0400 In-Reply-To: <20051020.220346.13027284.imp@bsdimp.com> (M. Warner Losh's message of "Thu, 20 Oct 2005 22:03:46 -0600 (MDT)") Message-ID: <40072758@serv3.int.kfs.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: "Boris B. Samorodov" Cc: doug@polands.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: Regression in device ath between BETA5 and RC1? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 13:28:19 -0000 On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 22:03:46 -0600 (MDT) M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20051020232308.GA77950@xor.obsecurity.org> > Kris Kennaway writes: > : On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 05:46:52PM -0500, Doug Poland wrote: > : > Kris Kennaway wrote: > : > >On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 05:11:41PM -0500, Doug Poland wrote: > : > > > : > > > : > >>I was seeing this behavior a lot on 5.2.1, 5.3, and, IIRC, 5.4. > : > >>Responsiveness was so poor as to make remote SSH sessions unusable. > : > >>When I installed -CURRENT then RELENG_6, then the NIC started performing > : > >>beautifully. Very stable and consistent. Now, with yesterday's cvsup'd > : > >>to RC1, the NIC/driver is performing poorly again. > : > > > : > > > : > >Go back to the previous version to verify it's not environmental or > : > >some other problem than a regression in FreeBSD. > : > > > : > Sure, can you tell me what tag to use in my supfile? Right now I have: > : > > : > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6 > : > : Use a date instead of a tag (see the cvsup docs). > *default release=cvs date=2005.10.10.12.23.45 > and try to find where, since June, the divergence of performance was. > We branched RELENG_6 in June, and there's been much merged from head > back into RELENG_6. >From the first letter of this thread: "Today I cvsup'd from BETA5 to RC1 and have noticed..." When did BETA-5 appeared? This can narrow down the search. WBR -- bsam