From owner-freebsd-current Sat Oct 17 13:03:33 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA18339 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sat, 17 Oct 1998 13:03:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns1.seidata.com (ns1.seidata.com [208.10.211.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA18328 for ; Sat, 17 Oct 1998 13:03:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@seidata.com) From: mike@seidata.com Received: from localhost (mike@localhost) by ns1.seidata.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA18733; Sat, 17 Oct 1998 16:02:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 17 Oct 1998 16:02:48 -0400 (EDT) To: Matt Behrens cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 3.0-RELEASE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 16 Oct 1998, Matt Behrens wrote: > I got the same thing on my 2477/16/63 disk (same machine I was Toshiba MK4006MAV driving a 7944/16/63 here. > Mike: what was the last beta you used successfully? I've been running the 5/20 SNAP with great success on multiple (heavily loaded) production SMP servers for awhile. I was going to take a newer NS up to BETA to play with it, but after trying 1014 and 1015 I fell back to the 5/20 SNAP again. I should try the 1017 SNAP... Later, -mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message