From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Jul 7 17:56:56 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA19125 for isp-outgoing; Mon, 7 Jul 1997 17:56:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from panda.hilink.com.au (panda.hilink.com.au [203.8.15.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA19119 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 1997 17:56:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from danny@localhost) by panda.hilink.com.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA25655; Tue, 8 Jul 1997 10:55:59 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 8 Jul 1997 10:55:58 +1000 (EST) From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" To: Hugo Pagola cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Wireless Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-isp@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 7 Jul 1997, Hugo Pagola wrote: > > > The Breezecom stuff is nice because it > > > does multi-rate (it goes to lower throughput if it can't make it at 3 > > > Mbps). However, compared to the Freewave radios they are pretty deaf (fine > > > for indoor use, but bad for long outdoor links). > > > > We are currently testing Breezecom's ``stuff'' over the same 12 mile > > leg in my original message, currently waiting on the attenna climber > > to crawl up the mast and deploy the 2.4GHz yagi. A quick little > > test says we could here the transmitter okay. > > > > I've an offer for solitek wireless cards that claim to be wavelan > compatible. > anybody test this card?. > The Breezecom stuff is configured with the some driver than wavelan? Breezecom make standalone ethernet/radio adaptors. A station adaptor plugs into the ethernet on the FreeBSD box. Downside of breezecom is that two station adaptors can't talk to each other without going through a hub. Danny