From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Nov  7 02:40:45 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 19A9516A4CE; Sun,  7 Nov 2004 02:40:45 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D91AD43D39; Sun,  7 Nov 2004 02:40:44 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id 6FA81148D9; Sat,  6 Nov 2004 20:40:44 -0600 (CST)
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 20:40:44 -0600 (CST)
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho
To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20041107003413.GQ24507@wantadilla.lemis.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0411062040240.13098-100000@pancho>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 07 Nov 2004 13:02:44 +0000
cc: Matthias Schuendehuette <msch@snafu.de>
cc: Wilko Bulte <wb@freebie.xs4all.nl>
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
cc: scottl@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: gvinum remains broken in 5.3-RELEASE?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2004 02:40:45 -0000

On Sun, 7 Nov 2004, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:

> I can appreciate that the leadup to 5.3-RELEASE has been painful, but
> what's the purpose of a release which doesn't work?  For a large
> number of Vinum users, 5.3 will be a release to avoid.

Perhaps this deserves an errata entry?

mcl