From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Dec 19 01:33:09 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 666F21346361 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 01:33:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cse.cem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it1-f181.google.com (mail-it1-f181.google.com [209.85.166.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EF5391781 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 01:33:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cse.cem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it1-f181.google.com with SMTP id w18so6928020ite.1 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:33:08 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ERR4M/OI7VHbwhqX+Qs0jdhypoxIzMGxgMl+rvnZxBs=; b=XO+vL04/qLwYvfBY1tTqf0NW01F4dreWbIz/j85FM8lRBA2e/SOPpeVk/XzNbEk9ws YkXFqPyl7tvfLn4D7dqqlYLV3KGQbC+6QNdQLRiWLLLhS5tiaL0Bz5TM41Duy8MmPZys NSePH30cNZUyIod0tv2XAm+nDXNRvyomyz+521SM2+dKwTyvW7ULUvWfXHHRejghRYPo IDf2GWhqQJkKkYQE+VfRzwrpsHxaYvkBnRhPHiAxoHnwxkgYau92x/78Drk6bNWKWi66 dMYIq7jh40dljvMZhJkLnTkqaxfWtdpor5DUZbmwbQ4wXdhlvxjZ2VyIoRPmQW+YvZjL zs1A== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbMo0fFjkCCfS7/EftTwL7lLzJ62JyU+32s/kRNsXyMAwKHntpU QXYVb8a5GON0iLp32sXpbECb+6Q5 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/VEKA16WUI7Pm7pEiE8ggmQiUcDCY70X0cdZvfjbahwqtKNcyEp08NhxAj0Sjg5DLY1PrZpHg== X-Received: by 2002:a24:16cc:: with SMTP id a195mr4957337ita.38.1545183181130; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:33:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-it1-f175.google.com (mail-it1-f175.google.com. [209.85.166.175]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b91sm2541541itd.26.2018.12.18.17.33.00 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:33:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-it1-f175.google.com with SMTP id a6so7051971itl.4 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:33:00 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a24:b64a:: with SMTP id d10mr4999257itj.149.1545183180446; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:33:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Reply-To: cem@freebsd.org From: Conrad Meyer Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:32:49 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: possible POLA violation for NFS server to make it Linux compatible To: Rick Macklem Cc: freebsd-current Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8EF5391781 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of csecem@gmail.com designates 209.85.166.181 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=csecem@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.91 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[cem@freebsd.org]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.95)[-0.945,0]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[cem@freebsd.org,csecem@gmail.com]; IP_SCORE(-2.95)[ip: (-9.72), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-3.59), asn: 15169(-1.38), country: US(-0.08)]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[cem@freebsd.org,csecem@gmail.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[181.166.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[181.166.85.209.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 01:33:09 -0000 On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 5:07 PM Rick Macklem wrote: > The change to make the FreeBSD NFSv4 server use vfs.nfsd.nfs_privport is trivial > and I think being compatible with Linux is important (I see it as the defacto > standard NFS implementation these days). > > What do others think I should do? Hi Rick, I think we should go ahead and honor nfs_privport. Best, Conrad