From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 28 22:31:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ACBC16A4CF; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 22:31:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E66EB43D62; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 22:31:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1SMVFhs062923; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:31:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j1SMVFrU062922; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:31:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:31:15 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Ruslan Ermilov Message-ID: <20050228223115.GB62844@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200502280923.j1S9NcKE004088@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050228093414.GA74879@ip.net.ua> <20050228093622.GB74879@ip.net.ua> <20050228182618.GB56766@dragon.nuxi.com> <20050228214233.GA6011@ip.net.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050228214233.GA6011@ip.net.ua> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 src/share/mk bsd.compat.mk X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 22:31:16 -0000 On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 11:42:33PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > If you are just hiding the warning, can you explain your reasoning, > as in my opinion it just kills the idea of "deprecation". People > will continue to use it, without letting us remove it safely later. 1. We don't deprecate it. There is no reason to. We keep other "ugly" stuff for even more trival reasons. 2. The warnings give faults postivies to build issues. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)