From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 13 18:44:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC77016A41C for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 18:44:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dodell@offmyserver.com) Received: from knight.ixsystems.net (afg.ixsystems.net [206.40.55.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07F043D1D for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 18:44:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dodell@offmyserver.com) Received: from [192.168.1.111] (afg.ixsystems.net [206.40.55.73]) by knight.ixsystems.net (8.12.10/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j5DIKTgs006952; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:20:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dodell@offmyserver.com) Message-ID: <42ADD3D5.6080103@offmyserver.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:43:33 -0700 From: "Devon H. O'Dell" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baldur Gislason References: <42ADD249.7020709@dnainternet.net> <20050613184128.GA16980@gremlin.foo.is> In-Reply-To: <20050613184128.GA16980@gremlin.foo.is> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: prioritizing small ip packets? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 18:44:01 -0000 Baldur Gislason wrote: > IPFW does have a queue feature which is a part of dummynet. > You can match packets based on size and send them to different queues. > > Baldur > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 09:36:57PM +0300, Erik Udo wrote: > >>I came across this idea for prioritizing small >>IP packets, so that for example HTTP requests, >>game packets and other small, but importat packets >>would get uploaded before the big packets. Big files >>are usually uploaded in bigger packets, right? >> >>So, i haven't found a way to make this happen, i googled >>for it but didn't find anything. Does PF or IPFW have this >>feature? I'm not sure the rationale is appropriate, though. You should be more worried about prioritizing ACKs if this is an asynchronous low-speed connection. --Devon