Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 10 Apr 2012 17:57:32 +1000
From:      Da Rock <freebsd-ports@herveybayaustralia.com.au>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD Port: samba34-3.4.14
Message-ID:  <4F83E7EC.10906@herveybayaustralia.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <B4AE04E7-92F5-4EB2-8542-8925A922ED93@mac.com>
References:  <4F7E498E.7070007@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <CALdFvJG7-4mP3w0U339L80hoRwVaexbCS40h3tbmjLkA%2Br=Asw@mail.gmail.com> <4F804679.2040803@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <CADLo83-FabXgEBxOAxuHGYDCoz6hv7vA5J9qKhVhg%2B5Ausogow@mail.gmail.com> <4F80D4F9.9020207@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F836A65.7080402@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <FD46D7FF-E4C7-438D-9959-A5ADF4047C0D@mac.com> <4F837E27.8070503@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <B4AE04E7-92F5-4EB2-8542-8925A922ED93@mac.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 04/10/12 16:30, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Apr 9, 2012, at 5:26 PM, Da Rock wrote:
> [ ... ]
>>> If you think there is a missing dependency, then doing send-pr with the fix is a reasonable procedure.
>> I was only thinking the maintainer might want to know and fix and test themselves before commit. I know I would as a maintainer.
> Sure-- a PR with a change to a port will be assigned to the maintainer to test and approve.

Ah. I wasn't aware that was the case, especially if the maintainer 
cannot specifically commit.
>
>>> However, you might first want to look into what was different in your case from pointyhat, since the builds of samba-3.x worked fine:
>>>
>>>    http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-9-latest-logs/samba34-3.4.14.log
>>>    http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-9-latest-logs/samba35-3.5.11.log
>>>    http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-9-latest-logs/samba36-3.6.3.log
>> Hmmm. You're right.
>>
>> I can narrow it down to the SWAT or AIO option (most likely given the obvious network connection there), but it could be ADS, ACL, or FAM; but I doubt that very much. You have me intrigued now, I have to look into it to know :)
>>
>> So what should the patch look like? Am I correct in my understanding of the BUILD_DEPENDS, or have I chased a goose on that one?
> Don't know-- I don't recall having a build of Samba fail for me any time recently, but if you can confirm that a specific option causes the build failure, that would help reproduce.
So far all the options are causing _a_ failure- swat, ads, aio, acl, 
fam. I'm still going, but I think thats all of them.
> Note that I'd gotten the impression that you had installed libnet separately, which would be a library and not just a build dependency...
I am still looking into it as time permits, but I'm not sure I 
understand the difference? I had to install libnet separately in order 
to build. How does that fit in your comment? I'm still a very newbie 
developer so I'm not always accurately understanding the terms, I think.

If I start getting these terms right I think I might just get better at 
this stuff in the makefiles :)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F83E7EC.10906>