From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 9 18:45:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C831065686 for ; Sat, 9 Aug 2008 18:45:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16CFA8FC33 for ; Sat, 9 Aug 2008 18:45:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from janh.freebsd (f054099164.adsl.alicedsl.de [78.54.99.164]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu5) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0ML25U-1KRtRB0Jdy-0007Pu; Sat, 09 Aug 2008 20:45:13 +0200 Message-ID: <489DE5B3.7070708@janh.de> Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2008 20:45:07 +0200 From: Jan Henrik Sylvester User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080726) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Torgeir Hoffmann References: 53237.84.48.122.117.1218294399.squirrel@webmail.uio.no Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/Qez8R29Yc5FskPo7yuAU6HJkW0vqEnauj1fA m0jm+B+uQi1IOOgvDKBUd7CkJEaCMg2YbML/nFsicsP5ZOhS86 b4+GpAcunhIhEAc8BJViA== Cc: questions-list freebsd Subject: Re: 7-stable packages on 7.0-release system? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2008 18:45:15 -0000 Torgeir wrote: > I assume that it is not advisable, but what can I expect to happen if > I try to use packages for 7-stable on a 7.0-release system? No, it is not advisable. I tried: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2008-June/177553.html As I said two weeks ago, that failure was predictable and the few offenders could be found, but I had another weird problem that could only be solved with recompile: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2008-July/179517.html For the opposite, using packages from an earlier point, compatibility is usually preserved, but not always, either: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2008-July/043950.html Not having newer binary packages for the latest RELEASE is a shortcoming on FreeBSD, but you will find many references that there are simply not enough resources. Cheers, Jan Henrik