From owner-cvs-all Thu Sep 2 13:38:28 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (dingo.cdrom.com [204.216.28.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F49714F60; Thu, 2 Sep 1999 13:38:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA01109; Thu, 2 Sep 1999 13:31:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199909022031.NAA01109@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams) Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/mkdir mkdir.1 mkdir.c In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 02 Sep 1999 14:31:33 MDT." <199909022031.OAA28195@mt.sri.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 13:31:36 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > > > So we have 2 against it, 2 not in favor but acknowledged the arguments as > > valid, 2 don't care, and 5 for. That makes 4 vs. 5, not to mention 100+ > > "I don't care enough to say anything". This hardly looks like a major > > force to block this -- looks like we'll go with "-v". > > I read it differently, and I see more vocifirous 'votes' against it. > I'm against it, since it bloats stuff that doesn't need to be bloated > for 99.9% of the users. > > KISS rules... No, the majority rules, and so far the majority is for the change. Being loud doesn't make up for being popular in this case. -- \\ The mind's the standard \\ Mike Smith \\ of the man. \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ -- Joseph Merrick \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message