From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Jun  6 13:19:48 1996
Return-Path: owner-stable
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA02793
          for stable-outgoing; Thu, 6 Jun 1996 13:19:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (rocky.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.10])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA02783;
          Thu, 6 Jun 1996 13:19:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id OAA26854; Thu, 6 Jun 1996 14:19:36 -0600
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 1996 14:19:36 -0600
From: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>
Message-Id: <199606062019.OAA26854@rocky.sri.MT.net>
To: "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG,
        committers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: miscfs/devfs 
In-Reply-To: <27731.834092293@palmer.demon.co.uk>
References: <199606062003.OAA26725@rocky.sri.MT.net>
	<27731.834092293@palmer.demon.co.uk>
Sender: owner-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Gary Palmer writes:
> Nate Williams wrote in message ID
> <199606062003.OAA26725@rocky.sri.MT.net>:
> > > Is devfs meant to have been tagged onto the 2.1 branch? I just noticed
> > > that it appeared in my checkout on freefall and the tags are there for
> > > both 2.0.5 and 2.1! Umm?!?
> 
> > That's because it existed in both 2.0.5 and 2.1 stable.
> 
> WHOOPS
> 
> Remind me to read the commit logs more carefully. Sorry. I just got a
> surprise when I did a ``cvs -q update -Pd -rRELENG_2_1_0'' and saw
> devfs stuff touched.

Yep, they shouldn't have gotten touched, so I re-touched them back. :)


Nate