From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Nov 3 11:41:22 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns.a1.org.uk (ns.a1.org.uk [194.105.64.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAEB837B4C5 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 11:41:19 -0800 (PST) Received: (from root@localhost) by ns.a1.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA02628 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 19:41:08 GMT (envelope-from bap) From: Bap Message-Id: <200011031941.TAA02628@ns.a1.org.uk> Subject: Re: named weirdness... In-Reply-To: <20001103133311.A20923@lerami.lerctr.org> from Larry Rosenman at "Nov 3, 2000 01:33:11 pm" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 19:41:07 +0000 (GMT) Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > This has never failed > In my case the zone and ptrs work on 5 other name servers > (I work for an ISP, and have been doing DNS for 7+ years). > > My question is why the NAMED in 4.2-BETA doesn't seem to be hearing > the notify's that the named on the primary *IS* sending out. > > named on the primary is 8.2.2-P5. > > Larry Understand that this is a separate issue, and as it's 19:300 on a Friday night, I'm off to the pub to get the weekend started! I also work for an ISP in Bristol, UK, and have been working with DNS for many years. Anyway, good luck with the problem, I need some alcahol ; -) Bap. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message