From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 30 23:18:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B0701065673; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 23:18:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: from gwyn.kn-bremen.de (gwyn.kn-bremen.de [212.63.36.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E46BE8FC12; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 23:18:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: by gwyn.kn-bremen.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id 5E02B191A39; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 00:18:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from saturn.kn-bremen.de (noident@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saturn.kn-bremen.de (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9UMoIjZ014715; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 23:50:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from nox@saturn.kn-bremen.de) Received: (from nox@localhost) by saturn.kn-bremen.de (8.14.2/8.13.6/Submit) id m9UMoHpl014714; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 23:50:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from nox) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 23:50:17 +0100 (CET) From: Juergen Lock Message-Id: <200810302250.m9UMoHpl014714@saturn.kn-bremen.de> To: rdivacky@FreeBSD.org X-Newsgroups: local.list.freebsd.emulation In-Reply-To: <20081029152314.GA34205@freebsd.org> References: <200810280859.24048@aldan> <20081028181731.GA30591@saturn.kn-bremen.de> <20081028205634.GA93288@freebsd.org> <20081029162105.18469pltiqtoqmao@webmail.leidinger.net> Organization: home Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, Mikhail Teterin Subject: Re: flash9 checklist (was: flash-9, 10 on FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 23:18:29 -0000 In article <20081029152314.GA34205@freebsd.org> you write: >On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 04:21:05PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: >> Quoting Roman Divacky (from Tue, 28 Oct 2008 >> 21:56:34 +0100): >> >> >On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 07:17:31PM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote: >> >> >>3. Make sure linprocfs is mounted to /compat/linux/proc . >> > >> >the linux-firefox script should check for /proc being mounted. It's not >> >a hard thing to do... any takers? :) >> >> Is it needed for plain linux-firefox? If not, it should not check for >> it. I don't object to extend the script to check for linuxprocfs if >> some trigger file (flashplugin.so in the correct location?) exists. > >if I understood it correctly it reads something needed for threading >to work correctly from /proc, iirc it reads (/compat/linux)/proc//maps (in chunks, which didn't work with the old code.) > we can expect problems in future >when people dont mount linprocfs.. > >maybe we should put some checks into linuxulator... Or if we put something in browser startup scripts it also needs to be in the native ones since those can use linux flash via wrappers as well. Just mentioning... Juergen