From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 29 16:40:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A3C16A41F for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 16:40:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99EF143D48 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 16:40:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j8TGeLRg067392 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 16:40:21 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j8TGeLhU067391; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 16:40:21 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 16:40:21 GMT Message-Id: <200509291640.j8TGeLhU067391@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Renato Botelho Cc: Subject: Re: ports/86475: New Ports: devel/sfslite-noopt and devel/sfslite-dbg; sfslite with different build options X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Renato Botelho List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 16:40:22 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/86475; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Renato Botelho To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, krohn@mit.edu Cc: Subject: Re: ports/86475: New Ports: devel/sfslite-noopt and devel/sfslite-dbg; sfslite with different build options Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:30:53 -0300 Is there a reason to don't include these new options on sfslite port? Cheers -- Renato Botelho