From owner-freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org  Wed Feb  8 14:03:24 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-toolchain@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC861CD65B4
 for <freebsd-toolchain@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Wed,  8 Feb 2017 14:03:24 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C60CD1371
 for <freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.org>; Wed,  8 Feb 2017 14:03:24 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v18E3OUf006063
 for <freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 14:03:24 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 216908] security/gnutls: does not build on 12-CURRENT aarch64
 after llvm 3.9 toolchain integration
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 14:03:24 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: emaste@freebsd.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-216908-29464-oazzUtfti3@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-216908-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-216908-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain
 <freebsd-toolchain.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-toolchain>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-toolchain-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-toolchain/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-toolchain-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-toolchain-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 14:03:25 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D216908

--- Comment #2 from Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> ---
(In reply to Dimitry Andric from comment #1)
> I wasn't aware that lld was used by default for aarch64, I thought this u=
sed
> an external binutils port based ld instead?

buildworld and buildkernel use the binutils ld by default, but as of 3.9 we
have added LLD by default so a linker is available in the base system.

> But in any case, @Ed, upstream r277105 seems like a relatively safe one to
> import into 3.9 as we have it now in head and stable/11?

I agree, it should be safe for us (although upstream is unlikely to backport
it).

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=