From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Apr 14 00:37:08 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA23590 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 00:37:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA23583 for ; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 00:37:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id AAA07926; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 00:37:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 00:37:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White X-Sender: dwhite@localhost Reply-To: Doug White To: Jim Dutton cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Newer versions of bsd...mk files anywhere? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 11 Apr 1997, Jim Dutton wrote: > Hmmm - the bsd.subdir.mk has a date of 2/1/91 in its internal comments, as > does bsd.port.subdir.mk. > > The newer versions of the same files have an additional line with a 1997 > date. How "stale" is stale?? I don't know. :) If it's a problem, you can bring the bsd.port.mk down from -current and replace yours. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major