From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 21 18:24:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FFD9106566C for ; Mon, 21 May 2012 18:24:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nhs@schimke.net) Received: from mail.nurd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:e88e::131]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 544698FC12 for ; Mon, 21 May 2012 18:24:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.nurd.org (mail.nurd.org [192.168.0.131]) by mail.nurd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBDE31C36 for ; Mon, 21 May 2012 11:24:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=schimke.net; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=pickmepickme; bh=Wuba kL0mQ+R8uZm1qwboGAfVC+U=; b=RGN9Bf7iAR4daVDwlx+h3d06THyLElouELcu m3UUkpt08AuyeeH0fZxaLqEsoK3AxJ5x7gJWw2b1coprideDQ8Jp6fNcfCky0XFt Wp/zkbsEiqjlF7azL0CaI1DsUlsEFi3QeAivxdUOLyP/LWfeuNv7wG9w57tKqKlQ cWMvpL0= Received: from blitzwing.sea (sea02-v600-nat.marchex.com [174.137.113.40]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.nurd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2CA51C35 for ; Mon, 21 May 2012 11:24:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FBA8859.1040604@schimke.net> Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 11:24:25 -0700 From: Nathan Schimke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Breakage on 9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 18:24:31 -0000 On 05/21/2012 11:08 AM, Ed Schouten wrote: > Hi, > > Today I was bitten by the "jail: unknown parameter: allow.nomount" > bug. It seems this bug is at least more than one month old -- on > 9-STABLE! Why hasn't the commit that introduced this bug been backed > out? The code worked before. Now it's broken and we're waiting for an > MFC period? Using a Danish (Dutch?) axe, I was able to at least get my > box working again: I just hit the same error last night. Reverting r235624 (an MFC made 3 days ago) got my jails working again, but I haven't yet figured out why. Nathan