From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 00:23:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DFE15A0 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 00:23:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=172763643c=killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 140E1798 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 00:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r2d2 ([188.220.16.49]) by mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) (MDaemon PRO v10.0.4) with ESMTP id md50001710961.msg for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 00:23:46 +0000 X-Spam-Processed: mail1.multiplay.co.uk, Tue, 15 Jan 2013 00:23:46 +0000 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDRemoteIP: 188.220.16.49 X-Return-Path: prvs=172763643c=killing@multiplay.co.uk X-Envelope-From: killing@multiplay.co.uk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <84ADA364C97442B0BF06DB0BE4E6799C@multiplay.co.uk> From: "Steven Hartland" To: "Freddie Cash" , "George Mitchell" References: <50F49B50.3080507@m5p.com> Subject: Re: ctfconvert again Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 00:24:05 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Cc: FreeBSD-Current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 00:23:48 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Freddie Cash" > The following built without any issues, including GENERIC and a custom > kernel. I was pleasantly surprised that it was so easy to update from > 9.0-RELEASE to 10.0-CURRENT. I was expecting a lot more manual fiddling > and twiddling. To be clear it builds fine it just moans about "Unimplemented code at [dwarf_init_attr(400)]" LOTS. So its not that the build fails but that you get lots of invalid "warnings" which make it very difficult to see any valid warnings, cant see the wood for the trees :( Regards Steve ================================================ This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337 or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk.