From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 5 09:05:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4959E106566B for ; Wed, 5 May 2010 09:05:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from auryn@zirakzigil.org) Received: from mail.zirakzigil.org (mail.zirakzigil.org [82.63.178.63]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAD3F8FC12 for ; Wed, 5 May 2010 09:05:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.1.2]) by mail.zirakzigil.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 649C19645F; Wed, 5 May 2010 10:46:33 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zirakzigil.org Received: from mail.zirakzigil.org ([192.168.1.2]) by localhost (ext.zirakzigil.org [192.168.1.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tu79RjZ5Aib0; Wed, 5 May 2010 10:46:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from aurynmob2.giulioferro.it (unknown [192.168.1.2]) (Authenticated sender: auryn@zirakzigil.org) by mail.zirakzigil.org (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C7BFB96454; Wed, 5 May 2010 10:46:30 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4BE13067.1060606@zirakzigil.org> Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 10:46:31 +0200 From: Giulio Ferro User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100223 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Chadwick , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org References: <4BDEA86E.3050109@zirakzigil.org> <20100503110100.GA93137@icarus.home.lan> <4BDEC106.3040807@zirakzigil.org> <4BE110E3.8040902@zirakzigil.org> <20100505075242.GA57550@icarus.home.lan> In-Reply-To: <20100505075242.GA57550@icarus.home.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Freebsd 8.0 kmem map too small X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 09:05:14 -0000 On 05.05.2010 09:52, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Nope, it's happened again... Now I've tried to rise vm.kmem_size to 6G... > Did you set both vm.kmem_size and vfs.zfs.arc_max, setting the latter to > something *less* than vm.kmem_size? > > Yes. After your suggestion, I set vfs.zfs.arc_max: 3758096384 vm.kmem_size: 4G Now: vfs.zfs.arc_max: 3758096384 vm.kmem_size: 6392119296 >> I'm really astounded at how unstable zfs is, it's causing me a lot >> of problem. >> >> Why isn't it stated in the handbook that zfs isn't up to production yet? >> > I'm not at liberty to comment + answer this question. > > Why people responsible for ZFS on freebsd aren't saying anything? What's the status of this issue? Is someone working on this???