From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 14 23:48:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E5116A4CE for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 23:48:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail1.infoeng.flinders.edu.au (mail1.ist.flinders.edu.au [129.96.1.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA4043D2F for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 23:48:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tris@infoeng.flinders.edu.au) Received: from rhino (rhino.infoeng.flinders.edu.au [129.96.1.189]) j1ENmgR02726 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:18:42 +1030 (CST) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:18:42 +1030 From: Tristan To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050215101842.5823080a@rhino> In-Reply-To: <20050214110826.56fa6cf3@rhino> References: <20050214110826.56fa6cf3@rhino> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12b (GTK+ 1.2.10; sparc-sun-solaris2.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: gvinum or vinum in 5.3-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 23:48:46 -0000 On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:08:26 +1030 Tristan wrote: > > can anyone confirm what the preferred tool is > in 5.3-STABLE, vinum or gvinum ? Is gvinum > ready for production use in a RAID5 config ? Does this limitation still exist (from 5.3 ERRATA): While some uncommon configurations, such as multiple vinum drives on a disk, are not supported....