From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 22 15:01:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26471170 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 15:01:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ermal.luci@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com (mail-qc0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA718FC08 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 15:01:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id k19so7391613qcs.13 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 07:01:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=UyDYlkpF7Gac/L/uwnhhFGnzXkBkeHxtgBvYeXW/Am0=; b=U3wT6UUzZhR6w5tbh1QQTlUPIrmc3GlSwVThHw184wZ0xyT5Jat4BN9uyS53zzzoOr O2F4mA4OH3xSSS+dpXwDuk45NuYrUbjlHyT2wVhxjB5o/xN5+oYdXA0Aw+jEx5rryZzl mIQpeqGhX76rvoE9r3+j3b70lKzBZ1JT9HUNPRo5juPPXznTiMMNWHHuYbzgtYx2aZdU n1epYYDWmwnlMNEyHqIZaumdTPT0RsdTmiP1oTKNCrfAjfCecx1ZomuTgo1MccXrfxqR Y6jr4C1tqhQG2lFpv11hV08NcYWnsAwvC10uk9ch12KpAoIMq70gglk0k5LzhsWN4eJd fWgQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.49.14.193 with SMTP id r1mr858605qec.50.1353596484868; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 07:01:24 -0800 (PST) Sender: ermal.luci@gmail.com Received: by 10.49.121.163 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 07:01:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:01:24 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: CL-DrOEFizOjjAXhd69xuqua-o4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Upgrading FreeBSD to use the NEW pf syntax. From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ermal_Lu=E7i?= To: Ian FREISLICH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: "freebsd-pf@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 15:01:33 -0000 On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Ian FREISLICH wrote: > =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ermal_Lu=E7i?= wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Sami Halabi wrote: > > > This was actually discussed much before, as I read it would make some > > > issues with the new pf-smp work done by gleb. > > > > > Not really since Gleb just changed the locking and nothing else. > > All his work is under the hood. > > > > He actually broke if-bound state but that's another story. > > Do you have more details on this? We use ifbound state in production > and I haven't noticed any issues with ifbound state, the way that > we use it. > > There is however an issue with route-to and reply-to when using > ifbound state, but that problem existed before Gleb's work. > > Which issue you are referring to here? > Ian > > -- > Ian Freislich > -- Ermal