From owner-freebsd-chat Fri Oct 8 6:36:37 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from bytor.rush.net (bytor.rush.net [209.45.245.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6751D14E61 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 1999 06:36:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lynch@bsdunix.net) Received: from localhost (lynch@localhost) by bytor.rush.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA15058; Fri, 8 Oct 1999 09:36:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 8 Oct 1999 09:36:18 -0400 (EDT) From: Pat Lynch X-Sender: lynch@bytor.rush.net To: Dave Walton Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: praise be to Torvalds? In-Reply-To: <19990929004056.2942.qmail@modgud.nordicrecords.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org can they do that? I thought the GPL strictly prohibits extra "conditions" like the CPSL. of course who's to say the GPL would hold up in court. I'm rather amused.... I hope I find someone running one of these boxes...I'll change everything back to "daemon. kill, and abort" ;) -Pat ___________________________________________________________________________ Pat Lynch lynch@rush.net lynch@bsdunix.net Systems Administrator Rush Networking ___________________________________________________________________________ On Tue, 28 Sep 1999, Dave Walton wrote: > > This is cute. Brings a whole new meaning to the concept of > operating system holy wars. But why do you suppose they didn't > base this project on BSD? We have such an adorable mascot! > > http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/zd/19990927/tc/19990927332.html > > > Dave > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Dave Walton dwalton@acm.org > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message