Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:35:09 -0400 From: Glen Barber <glen.j.barber@gmail.com> To: Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Processes dying with signal 11 Message-ID: <4ad871310906191235p3cb3b3c0h1ad61e3904e209b9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4ad871310906191221q2aadc509sfbc41eb6e8db00e8@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090619175537.36128909@gluon.draftnet> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906192103360.74610@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20090619201419.27fcec9b@gluon.draftnet> <4ad871310906191221q2aadc509sfbc41eb6e8db00e8@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Glen Barber<glen.j.barber@gmail.com> wrote= : > I would suspect hardware. =A0Most probably RAM than anything else > initially. =A0Can you run memtest86+? > Also, for what it's worth, I had this similar scenario a few years ago. After numerous hardware replacements (RAM, motherboard, etc, etc) it turned out to the the CPU that was the problem. It was bad enough that I couldn't even do a 'portsnap fetch' because the checksum would be incorrectly calculated. --=20 Glen Barber
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4ad871310906191235p3cb3b3c0h1ad61e3904e209b9>