From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Mar 27 05:21:42 1995
Return-Path: ports-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id FAA09048 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 27 Mar 1995 05:21:42 -0800
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id FAA09042 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Mar 1995 05:21:39 -0800
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.9/8.6.9) id FAA13023; Mon, 27 Mar 1995 05:21:25 -0800
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 1995 05:21:25 -0800
Message-Id: <199503271321.FAA13023@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: bsd.port.mk now understands INSTALL, DEINSTALL and REQ
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami/=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=)
Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I hacked bsd.port.mk to understand INSTALL, DEINSTALL and REQ as
standard names for package scripts with the functions that are obvious
from their names.  It will now add them to PKG_ARGS if they are found
under the pkg/ subdirectory.

I'm now cleaning up Makefiles for ports already on freefall, so this
message is just FYI for future references.

Satoshi

P.S. The two ports eispack and linpack have the file pkg/+REQ that is
     apparently not used (PKG_ARGS not redefined in Makefile).  Can
     the maintainer of these ports check them?