From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 7 14:58:07 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E20737B401 for ; Wed, 7 May 2003 14:58:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asylum.org (asylum.org [208.13.58.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44D6D43F93 for ; Wed, 7 May 2003 14:58:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dave@asylum.org) Received: from ward.asylum.org (p139.asylum.org [208.13.58.139]) by asylum.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h47Lw5V38534 for ; Wed, 7 May 2003 16:58:05 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from dave@asylum.org) X-Authentication-Warning: asylum.org: Host p139.asylum.org [208.13.58.139] claimed to be ward.asylum.org Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20030507165554.03de4d70@asylum.org> X-Sender: dave@asylum.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 16:58:06 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: dave In-Reply-To: <4FCD7FFC-80D2-11D7-88FF-000393D5B08A@mtsolidarity.com> References: <200305071311.47544.a.carter@intrasoft.lu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Re: Searching for Multi Processors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 21:58:07 -0000 At 04:24 PM 5/7/2003, Mike Solis wrote: >I'm trying to determine if FreeBSD is detecting both my processors. I >reconfigured my kernel to include SMP. I used dmesg | less to view which >devices and notice some changes such as this: > >FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor motherboard > cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 0, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee00000 > cpu1 (AP): apic id: 1, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee00000 > io0 (APIC): apic id: 2, version: 0x00178011, at 0xfec00000 > >and then further down: > >SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! > >My estimate is that things are up and running smoothly but I'm not 100% sure. > >Thanks for the help, Looks like you are good to go. If you run top you can look at both cpu's in the "C" column labeled as 0 and 1 as well as the processes associated with each one. dave