Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:24:18 GMT From: Andrew Storms <astorms@ncircle.com> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/127302: port swatch-3.2.1_1 multiple issues Message-ID: <200809111624.m8BGOIBI005994@www.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <200809111630.m8BGU3iv010000@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 127302 >Category: ports >Synopsis: port swatch-3.2.1_1 multiple issues >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Thu Sep 11 16:30:02 UTC 2008 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Andrew Storms >Release: 6.3 >Organization: >Environment: >Description: swatch-3.2.1_1 The file /usr/local/bin/swatch is identical to /usr/local/etc/rc.d/swatch.sh In prior versions of swatch, /usr/local/bin/swatch contained perl code, not just identical to the bourne shell startup script. Diff'ing files in /usr/ports/security/swatch/work/swatch-3.2.1 confirms that 'swatch' and 'swatch.sh' are identical. However, the contents inside the .tar.gz as found in /usr/ports/distfiles/ do contain a file 'swatch' that does contain the expected perl code. I suspect a bug in applying the patches is nuking the program file in question. Man page installed at /usr/local/man/man1/swatch.1.gz is blank. All we have in that file is the Title section: .\" ======================================================================== .\" .IX Title "SWATCH 1" .TH SWATCH 1 "2008-09-11" "perl v5.8.8" "User Contributed Perl Documentation" >How-To-Repeat: install swatch swatch-3.2.1_1 from ports >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200809111624.m8BGOIBI005994>