From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jan 28 14:50:03 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA11767 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Wed, 28 Jan 1998 14:50:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA11721 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 1998 14:50:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: (from asami@localhost) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) id OAA14662; Wed, 28 Jan 1998 14:49:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 1998 14:49:35 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199801282249.OAA14662@vader.cs.berkeley.edu> To: jkh@time.cdrom.com CC: ports@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <20236.885842669@time.cdrom.com> (jkh@time.cdrom.com) Subject: Re: Now that Netscape can be packaged... From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * No big loss - Netscape GOLD is *ugly*. :-) Um, if ugliness is the issue, I can think of half dozen other ports that I'd rather get rid of. :> Seriously, I've seen people use the "gold" version, and they seemed to, um, enjoy it. (In what way, I wouldn't say.) If it's ok for everyone, I'll split up the ports. Satoshi