Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 09:09:20 -0600 From: "Samuel Chow" <cyschow@shaw.ca> To: "Jimmy Lantz" <jimmy.lantz@lusidor.com> Cc: <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: mount(8) mount_union(8) and the slippery wet floor... Message-ID: <001001c25425$0c11a000$2784412f@ca.nortel.com> References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020904132723.00bc28e8@mail.lusidor.nu> <20020904124832.GA15994@submonkey.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ceri Davies" <setantae@submonkey.net>
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 01:46:42PM +0200, Jimmy Lantz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > My question is:
> > Is the mount union mentioned in MOUNT(8) also affected by the slippery
wet
> > floor in MOUNT_UNION(8)??
> > Or can I safely use the mount with the option union?
>
> They are the same thing.
>
> Having said that, I heavily used mount_union for about a month back in
March
> or so, and I didn't have any problems with it.
I have been using mount_union for /usr/src, /usr/obj, and
/usr/ports. No problem whatsoever.
---
Samuel Chow
cyschow@shaw.ca
This message is displayed using recycled electrons.
Segmentation Fault (core dumped)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?001001c25425$0c11a000$2784412f>