From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 12 07:00:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53B0B106564A for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 07:00:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com (mail-ee0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE8418FC1C for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 07:00:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eeke52 with SMTP id e52so1038394eek.13 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 00:00:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=wDAUuBavzNQtMRvkLsJpHw1LElqMy6YYaWTudRHpybY=; b=wKd6H5zHOtqa0MDTHG6CUudtMlp00ft7bkU9Eg0HLTa7PmPr8tESgy4hZBA2Z8faON h53L7MLtTmdUqE4sZYQmd51ikB0hYXLClX8jiyUkUFWkS4WrnVilj4cV7AsGGXFb5j84 KAGwa7BZEaMrBQw+H1U60MEaNNq6Wnaxxyiucaba8bMN+y3tNP0B/qsoOdY2++50dasH 3T4plmwHLBsOp4FsOrS79ibHfSxNc8+UvY4kovlFgwYMgHxVqXEZh2bKPKFkNCqks+Nr XaJlIVhIYA240RB7aYJk2+uFJrv3Q7tbkIPS8whRZtrRH4Y2Yh9gCyGyWG4cHW6y4Lxw kheg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.157.18 with SMTP id z18mr5615622bkw.16.1347433246646; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 00:00:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.10.141 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 00:00:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.10.141 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 00:00:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120912060420.GE31029@lonesome.com> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:00:46 +0100 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Christer Solskogen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Mark Linimon , FreeBSD , Andreas Nilsson Subject: Re: Clang as default compiler X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 07:00:48 -0000 On 12 Sep 2012 07:19, "Christer Solskogen" wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Mark Linimon wrote: > > > For most of the failures, we are already aware of them, as a result of > > our periodic runs. So, just filing a PR to say "broken on clang" doesn't > > really help us all that much. > > > > I disagree. Just a tiny bit ;-) > If the PR says that USE_GCC=4.2 works as a workaround, it helps. We don't want thousands of PRs duplicating the information from a simple list of failures. Any can be fixed in this way. Chris