From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar 31 08:42:04 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D945437B404
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 08:42:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3161843F93
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 08:42:04 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from kstewart@owt.com)
Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233])
	by rutger.owt.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id h2VGfxp19787;
	Mon, 31 Mar 2003 08:41:59 -0800
From: Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com>
To: Buki <dev@null.cz>, stable@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 08:41:59 -0800
User-Agent: KMail/1.5
References: <20030331163232.GA6705@dak2060.sh.cvut.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20030331163232.GA6705@dak2060.sh.cvut.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200303310841.59224.kstewart@owt.com>
Subject: Re: portupgrade weirdness
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:42:10 -0000

On Monday 31 March 2003 08:32 am, Buki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am begining to think there is something wrong with portutils
> (notice the difference between pkg_version and portversion):
>
> buki@dak2060:/usr/ports#portversion -v | grep -v =
> XFree86-libraries-4.3.0     <  needs updating (port has 4.3.0_1)
> cvsup-without-gui-16.1f     <  needs updating (port has 16.1g)
> ghostscript-gnu-7.05_3      <  needs updating (port has 7.05_4)
> portupgrade-20030308_2      >  succeeds port (port has 20030228)
>
> buki@dak2060:/usr/ports#pkg_version -v | grep -v =
> XFree86-libraries-4.3.0             <   needs updating (port has
> 4.3.0_1) cvsup-without-gui-16.1f             <   needs updating (port
> has 16.1g) fontconfig-2.1_6                    <   needs updating
> (port has 2.1_7) ghostscript-gnu-7.05_3              <   needs
> updating (port has 7.05_5) lftp-2.6.4                          <  
> needs updating (port has 2.6.5) mutt-devel-1.5.3                    <
>   needs updating (port has 1.5.4) net-snmp-5.0.6                     
> <   needs updating (port has 5.0.8) w3m-0.4                          
>   <   needs updating (port has 0.4.1)
>
> buki@dak2060:/home/buki>uname -a
> FreeBSD dak2060.xx.xx.cz 5.0-RELEASE-p7 FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE-p7 #4:
> Mon Mar 31 10:56:15 CEST 2003    
> buki@dak2060.xx.xx.cz:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DAK2060  i386
>
> ports cvsup-ed today an hour ago
>

Did you "portsdb -uU" to upgrade your INDEX files? This is the kind of 
thing that a mismatched INDEX and INDEX.dv would produce.

Kent

> also, I am getting some 'Checksum mismatch' errors, namely with w3m,
> lftp.
>
> Buki

-- 
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA

http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html