From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 25 19:26:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3A3106564A for ; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 19:26:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C8DA8FC13 for ; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 19:26:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n6PJPdvT046661; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 13:25:39 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n6PJPdZI046658; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 13:25:39 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 13:25:39 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Polytropon In-Reply-To: <20090725190832.11e6843d.freebsd@edvax.de> Message-ID: References: <20090723174350.GA1346@stamfordbru> <20090724085743.9abb7f2e.freebsd@edvax.de> <20090724150239.GA1167@stamfordbru> <20090725084138.f4338065.freebsd@edvax.de> <20090725190832.11e6843d.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 25 Jul 2009 13:25:39 -0600 (MDT) Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Bob Hall Subject: Re: Restarting hal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 19:26:45 -0000 On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, Polytropon wrote: > On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 07:56:17 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block wrote: >> >> Option "AutoAddDevices" "Off" should disable hal devices even if >> xorg-server has been built with hal. > > I'm aware of this. Just trying to point out the options, and that a one-line change in xorg.conf is lower impact than rebuilding xorg-server. > There are other "workarounds" to get the default stuff working again > (option Don't-Zap for example), so X installations relying on > xorg.conf can work again. Since some defaults have changed in newer versions of xorg, that last sentence is confusing. Maybe s/default stuff working again/legacy behavior/ s/work/work as expected/ -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA