From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jun 2 01:53:55 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA08258 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 01:53:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from noc.demon.net (firewall-user@server.noc.demon.net [193.195.224.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA08253 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 01:53:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by noc.demon.net; id JAA26301; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 09:53:48 +0100 (BST) Received: from stress.noc.demon.net(195.11.55.5) by inside.noc.demon.net via smap (3.2) id xma026293; Mon, 2 Jun 97 09:53:33 +0100 Received: from hdm by stress.noc.demon.net with local (Exim 1.61 #3) id 0wYSrs-0003C2-00; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 09:53:32 +0100 To: Brian Somers cc: Terry Lambert , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, internet@demon.net Subject: Re: fetch X-Mailer: nmh v0.14, exmh 2.0gamma, gvim 4.5 X-Colour: Green In-reply-to: <199706010004.BAA10800@awfulhak.demon.co.uk> Date: Mon, 02 Jun 1997 09:53:31 +0100 From: Dom Mitchell Message-Id: Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Brian Somers wrote: > > Has demon refused to correct their server software? Or have > > they not been asked? > > They havn't been asked (yet). I've cc'd them and would expect > a reply sometime soon. I'll forward this message to the appropriate people (I don't do web stuff). However, we do use several different servers on various machines - which one is giving the problem you describe? -Dom