From owner-freebsd-current Thu Feb 27 20:10: 0 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D1037B401 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 20:09:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.reptiles.org (mail.reptiles.org [198.96.117.157]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC49143FB1 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 20:09:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from geoffrey@reptiles.org) Received: from mail.reptiles.org([198.96.117.157]) (1032 bytes) by mail.reptiles.org via sendmail with P:esmtp/R:bind_hosts/T:inet_zone_bind_smtp (sender: ) id for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 23:09:56 -0500 (EST) (Smail-3.2.0.115-Pre 2001-Aug-6 #2 built 2002-Nov-19) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 23:09:56 -0500 (EST) From: Geoffrey Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Any ideas why we can't even boot a i386 ? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20030227230123.M28626-100000@iguana.reptiles.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > It points out that no one uses I386 kernels. Is it more valuable > to have GENERIC_I386 or KDE on disc 1? If it came down to that I > would pick KDE. > This is getting silly. As much respect as I have for you, KDE is not and shouldn't be part of this OS. Should Gnome be on the first disc too then? What about Windowmaker or fvwm? I was evidently under the mistaken impression this was about nuts and bolts. If we are to focus on window dressing, we are definitely hozed. Cheers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message