Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 18:42:52 +0200 From: Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt@burggraben.net> To: Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> Cc: Joseph Mingrone <jrm@freebsd.org>, Jan Beich <jbeich@freebsd.org>, Craig Leres <leres@freebsd.org>, Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 980444a82fbd - main - www/firefox: update to 100.0 (rc2) Message-ID: <YnFbjFTe8RtIbwAE@elch.exwg.net> In-Reply-To: <20220503175240.89a47079840b06ce1a6cc22a@bidouilliste.com> References: <YnAm4GoVYvfpyr9E@elch.exwg.net> <05c2a241-5d32-24d9-c223-66aa9ca99b75@freebsd.org> <YnBU8c5L6eNIn5mB@elch.exwg.net> <76d4fb65-b1df-2941-cc06-5ab23607a233@freebsd.org> <d9e5419b-3d4e-ab4b-5fbe-8306cc7196cd@freebsd.org> <20220503094616.ad8309626972ab0c7d6c1cd9@bidouilliste.com> <4k26-hkiv-wny@FreeBSD.org> <86y1ziab1f.fsf@phe.ftfl.ca> <YnFOCpAQ5pvts3e4@elch.exwg.net> <20220503175240.89a47079840b06ce1a6cc22a@bidouilliste.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
## Emmanuel Vadot (manu@bidouilliste.com): > That's good for now thanks but what about the futur ? > Should we allow to have LTO turn on on port that uses both LLVM and > Rust ? Because otherwise it will happen again when a new rust version > if released and the llvm version isn't the same. For this part: I'd rather leave LTO=off for good. I did never test it, and I won't: I feel like I'm already spending more time on building gecko ports than on using them, so LTO is a net negative for me, it doubles the build time and saves a whopping 300kB on package size. Whoever wants to play with LTO, fine, but if it breaks both parts are yours to keep. Gruß, Christoph -- Spare Space
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?YnFbjFTe8RtIbwAE>