From owner-freebsd-net Thu Mar 7 4:20:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51.attbi.com [204.127.198.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016E337B429 for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 04:20:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from InterJet.elischer.org ([12.232.206.8]) by rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020307122008.JZRJ2626.rwcrmhc51.attbi.com@InterJet.elischer.org>; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 12:20:08 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA41541; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 04:05:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 04:05:27 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: Russo Roberto Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: (FreeBSD TCP) vs (Linux TCP) In-Reply-To: <20020307105030.11376.qmail@web13006.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org It may or may not help but 4.3/4.4 had a few bad TCP bugs that were fixed in 4.5. 4.5 + ALTQ patch may give better results. On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Russo Roberto wrote: > Hi, > > I am working to evaluate performance of > throughput between two PC connected between > a Fore-ATM card adapter to a network: > the netwotk is composed of a PVC of 4Mbps between > three routers and I am just looking to use > differente queuing discipline like FIFO-PQ-WFQ. > > I have configured the two PC with the same Operating > Systems: a Linux (Red-Hat) and a FreeBSD v4.3 (Kame > Patch) and I am using NETPERF to make throughput > test. > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message