Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 12:38:53 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: jail@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 251046] bhyve PCI passthrough does not work inside jail Message-ID: <bug-251046-29815-Hz5crdWkMA@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-251046-29815@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-251046-29815@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D251046 Anatoli <me@anatoli.ws> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |me@anatoli.ws --- Comment #7 from Anatoli <me@anatoli.ws> --- Hi All, > Even then I'm not sure why it's useful to jail the bhyve process - what d= oes it buy you? The idea to run bhyve inside jail is to provide an additional layer of secu= rity for potential vm-escape vulnerabilities in bhyve. This is the way VMs are executed on Linux (protected by AppArmor and SEL) a= nd Illumos. Currently it's possible to run bhyve in jail, but not with PCI passthrough. > A better solution would be to extend pci(4) so that bhyve can use it to d= o everything required for PCI passthrough. Mark, could you please give us a hint on what should be done to extend pci(= 4) so jail changes are not needed? We are willing to implement this, but need = some guidance. One more security improvement that bhyve needs is to run it without root, b= ut that's another story for another report. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-251046-29815-Hz5crdWkMA>