From owner-freebsd-multimedia Sun Mar 19 10:39:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from rah.star-gate.com (216-200-29-190.snj0.flashcom.net [216.200.29.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C06A37B743; Sun, 19 Mar 2000 10:39:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA40955; Sun, 19 Mar 2000 10:38:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Message-Id: <200003191838.KAA40955@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: "Cameron Grant" Cc: "Conrad Sabatier" , stable@FreeBSD.ORG, multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Suggestions for improving newpcm performance? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 19 Mar 2000 16:38:04 GMT." <001a01bf91c1$7f62a4b0$0304020a@NENYA> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2000 10:38:01 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > the situation with voxware is that it will remain in 4.x, but unless a > maintainer comes forward who will convert it to newbus, in -current it will > soon be toast. I can't promise anything specially since I have a new job;nevertheless, before you decide to toast the voxware from current send me mail . If -core decides to toast voxware I will probably pick up the maintainence of voxware from right here were maintainence of voxware used to be. The latter is not a bad idea since it will avoid conflicts between -core and I. -- Amancio Hasty hasty@rah.star-gate.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-multimedia" in the body of the message